IGCSE (First Language) Directed Writing Practice 2, November 2018 - [Paper 2 - 40 marks]
Why don’t I appreciate what I have?
This article
explores issues to do with appreciation.
Appreciation seems such a half-hearted
emotion, a sort of weedy cousin to the chest-bursting emotions of love and
anger. Appreciation never moved mountains. No one ever cried into their pillow
listening to a song about appreciation. ‘I appreciate you’ would be a good
greetings card to send if you really can’t think of anything better to say.
Yet appreciation – gratitude for what
you have, or what someone has done for you – is powerful and underrated; it
can make you
generally happier, lower
your stress hormones,
and strengthen your immune system. Appreciated workers give
that bit more. Lack of gratitude, however, can make you feel locked in a
never-ending cycle of dissatisfaction, constantly looking out for what you
lack.
So why don’t
you appreciate what you have? You have never been taught how to – it is a
specific skill. You probably think appreciating what you have is foolish, unambitious or
tempting fate, or that you shouldn’t look at what you’ve got, but what
you could still have (Isn’t that ambition?). You may be out of practice, ground down and grumpy. Or
you may simply have accumulated too much stuff to appreciate what you have.
Having tangible products in your life, that gadget, that trinket, actually just
makes you want more, but the thrill of acquisition is short-lived. Ultimately,
possessions make you less grateful than simple pleasures such as family
gatherings or sitting next to someone you like and watching a film together.
The good
news is that experiences have been shown to engender more gratitude than mere
things, and experiences do not need to be expensive. A purchase can cause
excitement, but that excitement soon wears off. We get used to the
things around us in a process called habituation and don’t appreciate them anymore. Experiences grow in the
mind to become golden and precious.
Although
there is some evidence, in studies with chimpanzees, that gratitude is
hardwired in us as a reciprocal social tool (you scratch my back,
I’ll scratch yours), experts believe that we learn gratitude when we are young. If children are
shown how to deal with difficulties by appreciating what they do have, they
can become more
resilient adults. You can’t
control what happens. You
can only control how you look at a situation and deal
with it. Unappreciative adults can learn too. It’s simply a question of practice, of flexing a different
mind muscle.
However, it
doesn’t work just
by being told
you should be
grateful for what
you have. That
doesn’t make you appreciative, it just makes you defensive. To be appreciative,
you need to be reflective, to look at things differently. Therapists call
this ‘reframing’, though it doesn’t work for everyone.
In the last decade, there have been
more books and studies on appreciation than ever before. The short version
is: stop complaining
so much, look
around you, keep a
gratitude diary. ‘Don’t
look at what you haven’t got,’ they say. ‘Refocus. Do this every day
and you can retrain your brain to work
differently. You can stop being a moaner and become an appreciator.’
You see some people trying to be appreciative. They
photograph their dinner and post it on social media: ‘I’m
so lucky,’ they
bleat. This isn’t
the same as
being appreciative. Others
are just born ungrateful. They believe the world should live up
to its obligations and provide them with the things they want. That’s not a mindset
that leads to an appreciation of family, friends and colleagues. My own mother argues that appreciation should
be less about being grateful for what you have, or can get, and more about
being grateful for being able to help others.
The problem is all this being
appreciative seems so passive, doesn’t it? Being appreciative shouldn’t equal
becoming a doormat. Shouldn’t we always strive for more, for better, for
bigger?
Perhaps
the point is
that the more
you appreciate, the
more you see
to appreciate and
the more appreciative people are
of you.
Question 1
Imagine
that you are
a parent of
a pupil at
a school where
the headteacher is
considering introducing a series of lessons on appreciation.
Write a letter to the headteacher in which you should:
• identify
and evaluate the ideas about appreciation discussed in the passage
• consider
how effective the proposed lessons might or might not be.
Base your letter on the ideas in the article,
but be careful to use your own words. Address each of the bullet points.
Begin your letter:
‘Dear Headteacher … ’
Write about 250 to 350 words.
Suggested responses:
A1 ideas about
appreciation
• Not an exciting concept / does not
create an emotional response –
considered weak / half-hearted emotion / over- looked
• Emotional benefits
– can make you happier to
appreciate what you have /
more productive;
feel dissatisfied
with life
if not appreciated
• Physical benefits
of feeling
appreciative / strengthens
immune system / lowers stress
• Need to be taught how to appreciate
• Shows a lack of ambition / seen as
foolish / passive – being
grateful/appreciating what you
have is
considered negatively
• Materialistic possessions bring only temporary pleasure/encourage dissatisfaction
• People should appreciate what is really
important in life e.g. family ,
friends, colleagues or helping others
• If taught young,
appreciation can build resilience
A2 how effective
the proposed
lessons might be/possible ways to
show evaluation
• Dependent on individual – part of
your personality
so can’t
be taught
/ learned
from family,
not at
school
• Social tool – so should
learn how
to use
it
• Learn it when young – we teach
other social
skills in school so why
not appreciation?
•
Teachers can learn it
too by teaching it
(‘adults’ mentioned in the passage)
• Plenty of materials available recently – books/research
• Can affect the school ethos positively, or family
life /
wider society
• Lessons would have to
do more
than preach
– but being reflective is useful
in itself
for students
• Could discourage ambition in student /
give out
mixed messages
– e.g.
why try
hard if
you are
happy with
what you
have already
• Might waste curriculum time
for exam
students/universities don’t care
about appreciation
• Might save families money
on gadgetry
for their children
/ reduce
envy
•
Parents should just stop
spoiling their children
• Children are under pressure
to fit
in / not necessarily unappreciative
• Not appropriate to teach
poor children
to appreciate the little
they have
•
Classroom methods
unsuitable / better to
volunteer / see what others
don’t have
The discriminator is the evaluation of
the arguments,
which requires
candidates to draw inferences and
make judgements
about whether the advantages
outweigh the disadvantages. Perceptive responses
may compare
relative usefulness for different year groups
and adopt
a more
balanced approach taking into account
the perspective
and responsibilities
of the
writer. Ideas and opinions
must be
derived from the passage, developing
its claims
and assessing
their implications
with clear
and persuasive arguments.
Marks given based on:
·
Consistent sense of audience;
authoritative and appropriate style.
·
Fluent, varied
sentences
·
wide range of vocabulary.
·
Strong sense of structure, paragraphing and sequence.
·
Spelling, punctuation
and grammar
almost always accurate.
·
Gives a thorough, perceptive,
convincing response.
·
Reads effectively
between the lines.
·
Shows understanding
by developing
much of the reading material and
assimilating it into
a response
to the
task.
Comments
Post a Comment